Simple Harmonic Motion: Solved Problems with Solutions

3. (a) The amplitude is half the range of the displacement, or xm = 1.0 mm.

(b) The maximum speed vm is related to the amplitude xm by vm = ωxm, where ω is the angular frequency. Since ω = 2πf, where f is the frequency,

tr0QQADs=

(c) The maximum acceleration is

bcFKor4WACOdDBDtB3h0tmcpN5dKMUWIUaCTLBk5

6. (a) Since the problem gives the frequency f = 3.00 Hz, we have ω = 2πf = 6π rad/s (understood to be valid to three significant figures). Each spring is considered to support one-fourth of the mass mcar so that Eq. 15-12 leads to

r0p2PYZVka4YCvHMAHsASqUpc6BaEy9alQVYNTo0

(b) If the new mass being supported by the four springs is mtotal = [1450 + 5(73)] kg = 1815 kg, then Eq. 15-12 leads to

nAvQixiepG4xO5C8QE1qeIW2yUQADs=

9. The magnitude of the maximum acceleration is given by am = ω2xm, where ω is the angular frequency and xm is the amplitude.

(a) The angular frequency for which the maximum acceleration is g is given by QaCBJrSKn1qx2yx1iu+Bw92sVDMRoLplKKKTf2XX , and the corresponding frequency is given by

ITMIwjGGIIj7zmuSJJja36UxtcvObuyQmOLEWBAA

(b) For frequencies greater than 498 Hz, the acceleration exceeds g for some part of the motion.

13. When displaced from equilibrium, the net force exerted by the springs is –2kx acting in a direction so as to return the block to its equilibrium position (x = 0). Since the acceleration HomLp26WEQGShSxz8mHERT1DGLoKgFLBGCQYOD1g , Newton’s second law yields

MbU5jZDy0Azq2KyNI8IG8Wj6hqpAxnTnj4XXNBBW

Substituting x = xm cos(ωt + φ) and simplifying, we find

TJpTeIJsbkIPFAgDFYKMQhZmQnWHWmJRgYwJe0MS

where ω is in radians per unit time. Since there are 2π radians in a cycle, and frequency f measures cycles per second, we obtain

DSJOFXEUMkCq5oe9amMWCpUp0rVMyS1qljN6lWz6

16. From the highest level to the lowest level is twice the amplitude xm of the motion. The period is related to the angular frequency by Eq. 15-5. Thus, Foks2fqEHRqPMFp6fjscWgIWssdp2soqMZCUTRQo and ω = 0.503 rad/h. The phase constant φ in Eq. 15-3 is zero since we start our clock when xo = xm (at the highest point). We solve for t when x is one-fourth of the total distance from the highest to the lowest level, or (which is the same) half the distance from the highest level to the middle level (where we locate the origin of coordinates). Thus, we seek t when the ocean surface is at jwwGvIjPT83Nx0PYwBgEHhgYmR7RISGYYJ8AIpEE . With dH4YGdz3pRubOwMoHlFU5FAcVogaDvHwgZkQgsdc , we obtain

Wp7WPgHMWCoMcy10BzNueEVRviEBSrhD0bDxQN1m

which has t = 2.08 h as the smallest positive root. The calculator is in radians mode during this calculation.

20. We note that the ratio of Eq. 15-6 and Eq. 15-3 is v/x = –ωtan(ωt + φ) where ω = 1.20 rad/s in this problem. Evaluating this at t = 0 and using the values from the graphs shown in the problem, we find

φ = tan-1(–vo/xoω) = tan-1(+4.00/(2gif;base64,R0lGODlhDAANAHcAMSH+GlNvZnR3Y 1.20)) = 1.03 rad (or –5.25 rad).

One can check that the other “root” (4.17 rad) is unacceptable since it would give the wrong signs for the individual values of vo and xo.

24. To be on the verge of slipping means that the force exerted on the smaller block (at the point of maximum acceleration) is fmax = μsmg. The textbook notes (in the discussion immediately after Eq. 15-7) that the acceleration amplitude is am = ω2xm, where grYOnHgQAOw== is the angular frequency (from Eq. 15-12). Therefore, using Newton’s second law, we have

xYhZWriRWqkk43oXhLo7D2mthjkQ1AKRF0HuHlLT

which leads to

AM0DnBBZPPd52+LChkv4M648lCmvr0qslgFa7Sv3

25. (a) We interpret the problem as asking for the equilibrium position; that is, the block is gently lowered until forces balance (as opposed to being suddenly released and allowed to oscillate). If the amount the spring is stretched is x, then we examine force-components along the incline surface and find

uDpIQrCjmi4SMpBSrATAXageR5PgafojiGoZ4IY4

at equilibrium. The calculator is in degrees mode in the above calculation. The distance from the top of the incline is therefore (0.450 + 0.75) m = 1.20 m.

(b) Just as with a vertical spring, the effect of gravity (or one of its components) is simply to shift the equilibrium position; it does not change the characteristics (such as the period) of simple harmonic motion. Thus, Eq. 15-13 applies, and we obtain

mLa+un9Ys8xcLwhn7xCKZPOtqG8YUTlhh3rqfQmz

30. The total mechanical energy is equal to the (maximum) kinetic energy as it passes through the equilibrium position (x = 0):

mv2 = (2.0 kg)(0.85 m/s)2 = 1.445 J.

Looking at the graph in the problem, we see that U(x=10)=0.5 J. Since the potential function has the form ronOqEUK3K2fin9FrqKzAuZLp+eJ5UjRRR+AFuON , the constant is ggOAgA7 . Thus, U(x) = 1.445 J when x = ± 12 cm.

(a) Thus, the mass does turn back before reaching x = 15 cm.

(b) It turns back at x = 12 cm.

35. The problem consists of two distinct parts: the completely inelastic collision (which is assumed to occur instantaneously, the bullet embedding itself in the block before the block moves through a significant distance) followed by simple harmonic motion (of mass m + M attached to a spring of spring constant k).

(a) Momentum conservation readily yields v’ = mv/(m + M). With m = 9.5 g, M = 5.4 kg, and v = 630 m/s, we obtain j0SKSMNxV1XHWkJ8QgUcFki9DKGjpImnxljKyhog

(b) Since v’ occurs at the equilibrium position, then v’ = vm for the simple harmonic motion. The relation vm = ωxm can be used to solve for xm, or we can pursue the alternate (though related) approach of energy conservation. Here we choose the latter:

                                 Rahy6Q69alYaOoZZAjVqlr1RSLkwxivytWuStOoA

which simplifies to

gQggAAOw==

43. (a) A uniform disk pivoted at its center has a rotational inertia of Qg8cjUITHRtad1pqk0VmHm9EHyAJTQghIgmHABMj , where M is its mass and r is its radius. The disk of this problem rotates about a point that is displaced from its center by r + L, where L is the length of the rod, so, according to the parallel-axis theorem, its rotational inertia is kB3oBEJLuggAEEAADs= . The rod is pivoted at one end and has a rotational inertia of mL2/3, where m is its mass. The total rotational inertia of the disk and rod is

UhB2oV0QlVrZnHcn2UcpxfQMBAS31UliYgWamWps

(b) We put the origin at the pivot. The center of mass of the disk is

EFmvsscg2IQOEyTbr7LPQLhEEADs=

away, and the center of mass of the rod is yjliHyr5EcexpxCw8SrqICV0TJIJ5h4ucHNxAEwh away, on the same line. The distance from the pivot point to the center of mass of the disk-rod system is

znY7JhxZ3pUKDfIhAAOw==

(c) The period of oscillation is

GgnT7nKLz7ylbv85YIIAgA7

45. We use Eq. 15-29 and the parallel-axis theorem I = Icm + mh2 where h = d. For a solid disk of mass m, the rotational inertia about its center of mass is Icm = mR2/2. Therefore,

V1dLAViAOWeA3zWACLiAQQAAOw==

49. This is similar to the situation treated in Sample Problem 15-5, except that O is no longer at the end of the stick. Referring to the center of mass as C (assumed to be the geometric center of the stick), we see that the distance between O and C is h = x. The parallel axis theorem (see Eq. 15-30) leads to

MGRLztBlnAg7RYx8SsVj9lGw69mAhNS0F0cyLxXi

Eq. 15-29 gives

NEZqS2CeGdwgRh3k65iqosKm6GyVs5d8CcQyjChg

(a) Minimizing T by graphing (or special calculator functions) is straightforward, but the standard calculus method (setting the derivative equal to zero and solving) is somewhat awkward. We pursue the calculus method but choose to work with 12gT2/2π instead of T (it should be clear that 12gT2/2π is a minimum whenever T is a minimum). The result is

EMQAAA7

which yields BA+OIwIYo2AnBJ5MZTQUOYsBt7Z8ixTDIwNZGcEh as the value of x, which should produce the smallest possible value of T.

(b) With L = 1.85 m and x = 0.53 m, we obtain T = 2.1 s from the expression derived in part (a).

51. If the torque exerted by the spring on the rod is proportional to the angle of rotation of the rod and if the torque tends to pull the rod toward its equilibrium orientation, then the rod will oscillate in simple harmonic motion. If τ = –, where τ is the torque, θ is the angle of rotation, and C is a constant of proportionality, then the angular frequency of oscillation is ud5OMCAAjyfhqLAyHBCJkmJBEjBYDeROiQg4RFZn and the period is

fv4y7wPAgA7 ,

where I is the rotational inertia of the rod. The plan is to find the torque as a function of θ and identify the constant C in terms of given quantities. This immediately gives the period in terms of given quantities. Let gif;base64,R0lGODlhDwAUAHcAMSH+GlNvZnR3Y be the distance from the pivot point to the wall. This is also the equilibrium length of the spring. Suppose the rod turns through the angle θ, with the left end moving away from the wall. This end is now (L/2) sin θ further from the wall and has moved a distance (L/2)(1 – cos θ) to the right. The length of the spring is now

HsYLteg5Wu8jv17J7MosL+FytZiOh0g2JcaAqcwo .

If the angle θ is small, we may approximate cos θ with 1 and sin θ with θ in radians. Then the length of the spring is given by SSvn1Zvx6ixurs1lFvsgEQBreu3bt1w0oYi7ev37 and its elongation is Δx = /2. The force it exerts on the rod has magnitude F = kΔx = kLθ/2. Since θ is small, we may approximate the torque exerted by the spring on the rod by τ = –FL/2, where the pivot point was taken as the origin. Thus τ = –(kL2/4)θ. The constant of proportionality C that relates the torque and angle of rotation is C = kL2/4. The rotational inertia for a rod pivoted at its center is I = mL2/12, where m is its mass. See Table 10-2. Thus, the period of oscillation is

2tQEAAAOw==

With m = 0.600 kg and k = 1850 N/m, we obtain T = 0.0653 s.

56. The table of moments of inertia in Chapter 11, plus the parallel axis theorem found in that chapter, leads to

IP = MR2 + Mh2 = (2.5 kg)(0.21 m)2 + (2.5 kg)(0.97 m)2 = 2.41 kg⋅m2

where P is the hinge pin shown in the figure (the point of support for the physical pendulum), which is a distance h = 0.21 m + 0.76 m away from the center of the disk.

(a) Without the torsion spring connected, the period is

T = 2π√(IP/Mgh) = 2.00 s.

(b) Now we have two “restoring torques” acting in tandem to pull the pendulum back to the vertical position when it is displaced. The magnitude of the torque-sum is (Mgh + k)θ = IPα, where the small angle approximation (sinθθ in radians) and Newton’s second law (for rotational dynamics) have been used. Making the appropriate adjustment to the period formula, we have

T’ = 2π√(IP/(Mgh + k)).

The problem statement requires T = T’ + 0.50 s. Thus, T’ = (2.00 – 0.50) s = 1.50 s. Consequently,

k = IP(4π2/T’2) – Mgh = 18.5 N⋅m/rad.

60. (a) From Hooke’s law, we have

Z778ey+MOXr7Cv77974BpWBwhBPSpAlTucmLLHAI

(b) The amplitude decreasing by 50% during one period of the motion implies

KSiEkEAADs= .

Since the problem asks us to estimate, we let BQjQCyrF8VnGlsSwmchy8VCNhk56VSIVHmVQlNmJ . That is, we let

tcTsxxU2iMc9ZY4WFVm7DFAwhxx8DBwa7WAS0l7Z

so that T ≈ 0.63 s. Taking the (natural) log of both sides of the above equation and rearranging, we find

j4YamA0Q97vQMNgaynR+0FAQA7

Note: If one worries about the ω’ω approximation, it is quite possible (though messy) to use Eq. 15-43 in its full form and solve for b. The result would be (quoting more figures than are significant)

PjtlJGXchqIWMjoeAxDxGKNjWkkKIvWWah9Shi3C

which is in good agreement with the value gotten “the easy way” above.