The Bill of Rights and Civil Liberties

The Bill of Rights

Be able to:

  • Identify each of the 10 Amendments in the Bill of Rights and what each is about

Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

RASP(berry) P(i)

  • Religion
  • Assembly
  • Speech
  • Press
  • Petition

Amendment 2

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment 3

No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment 4

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (Search and Seizure)

Amendment 5

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.( Due Process; Double Jeopardy;Grand Jury; Eminent Domain, No self-incrimination)

Amendment 6

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. (Speedy, public trial; impartial jury where crime committed; know of accusations and witnesses against; obtain witnesses in favor; right to an attorney)

Amendment 7

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment 8

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment 9

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment 10

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

  • Identify examples of civil rights and civil liberties (be able to tell the difference between the two)

Civil liberties are the basic freedoms to think and to act that all people have and that are protected against government abuse. Civil rights are rights of fair and equal status and treatment and right to participate in the government. Civil liberties include religious freedom and civil rights include right to petition government to protect oneself.

The Importance of the Amendments

  • Explain why our Founding Fathers included key amendments in the Constitution

They did not like what the British government was doing so they made amendments to make sure the U.S. government did not become like the British Parliament.

  • Discuss the importance of the 14th Amendment to rights at the state level

The Bill of Rights only protected people from the federal government restricting certain rights. The 14th amendment has been used to incorporate rights from the federal government to apply to the state governments as well.

The Judicial Branch and the Constitution

  • Discuss the importance of court cases and the judicial branch to our understanding of the Constitution and in particular the amendments

Court cases are important because they help to further define our constitutional rights. The judicial branch is important because it helps interpret the constitution.

Limits on Free Speech

  • Identify times when free speech is NOT allowed
  • Clear and Present Danger
  • Slander
  • Libel
  • Obscenity
  • Substantial Disruption Standard
  • Analyze whether a public school would be able to punish a student for speech utilizing the six factors in your packet
  • Tinker v. Des Moines > Substantial Disruption Standard
  • Bethel School District v. Fraser > obscenity, explicit sexual metaphors
  • Clear Threats
  • In-school activities
  • School sponsored activities
  • cyberbullying

Interpretations of the Second Amendment

  • Explain the two interpretations of the Second Amendment
  • The amendment was meant only to allow states to form militias
  • The amendment protects an individual’s right to own all types of firearms

Search and Seizure

  • Identify and analyze situations when police would not need a search warrant to conduct a legal search
  • “In hot pursuit”–if police are currently pursuing someone, they have the right to search the dwelling they enter
  • If trash is left on a curb, it is considered public domain and may be searched
  • Get permission from a roommate or a spouse in a common space
  • Public school locker search
  • Explain what a search warrant must detail & how to obtain one

A search warrant must describe probable cause and what will be searched and seized. A judge must approve the warrant and sign it.

  • Analyze whether evidence would be allowed in court following a specific search, utilizing the exclusionary rule

If the evidence was “in plain sight” then the evidence may be used against a person in court because it was obtained legally; if it wasn’t “in plain sight” and instead it was in a closed drawer (which the police had no reason to search through), then the exclusionary rule can be applied because the evidence was found illegally (in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights)

  • Explain searches within a school context including drug searches

Searches within a school must have reasonable suspicion such as a dog smelling drugs. A school can only search your locker and not your backpack but they can drug test you at any time but this cannot violate your right to go to school.

Double Jeopardy

  • Analyze double jeopardy situations & know in what circumstances double jeopardy actually applies

Being charged with the same crime in a state and a federal court is fine. A mistrial is declared or jury does not reach a verdict – another trial can happen. Being charged for the same crime in both criminal and civil court.

Self-Incrimination and Miranda Rights

  • Analyze the taking of confessions, fingerprints, and blood & what the government must do if it forces you to testify

Governments can force an individual to testify but only if they grant them immunity from that testimony. Police must read you your Miranda rights before you confess anything so you don’t self-incriminate. This does not include fingerprints or blood because those are evidence not testimony.

  • Discuss the self-incrimination component and the Miranda Rights & the controversy over use of the Miranda Rights

Protection against self-incrimination extends outside the courtroom to when a suspect is arrested and if police do not read the Miranda rights, any statements made may not be used in court. Some guilty people go free because a police officer did not read them their rights. The warnings protect innocent people from being tricked or forced into confessing to a crime.

Due Process

  • Discuss whether an individual’s due process rights are violated & identify the goals of due process

Due process is violated when the government has deprived you of life, liberty, or property or that your loss of that right outweighs any larger interest. The goal is to protect people’s rights against unjust procedures or laws.

  • Be able to differentiate between procedural due process and substantive due process

Substantive due process is questioning if laws are in and of themselves just. Procedural due process questions whether the processes are just.

Jury Selection and Speedy Trials

  • Discuss the factors involved in jury selection and a speedy trial & why we grant public and speedy trials

Voir Dire allows lawyers to pick unbiased jurors so they can have a fair jury. By having a speedy and public trial, the witnesses have fresh memories, if the person is innocent, they aren’t in jail for too long, by making the trial public, people can see if something unconstitutional happens.

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

  • Explain how the terms “cruel and unusual” have been analyzed and by whom

They have been analyzed in lower courts but never explicitly by higher courts, left up to interpretation

The Ninth Amendment

  • Explain how the Ninth Amendment is considered the “loophole” amendment

Open for discussion by saying some rights may have been left out

The Tenth Amendment

  • Explain how the Tenth Amendment affected the division of power between various levels of government

Gave states powers not delegated to the Federal government

Know the following terms/court cases:


Selective Incorporation- the process of applying rights within the constitution to the states through the 14th amendment
Establishment Clause- Congress cannot create a national religion
Free Exercise Clause- Congress cannot stop you from practicing a religion
Defamation- A false accusation of an offence or a malicious representation of someone’s words or actions with intent
Slander- False spoken statements that injure a person’s reputation
Libel- False written statements that injure a person’s reputation
Prior Restraint- Government action that prohibits speech or other expression before it can take place (this is usually unconstitutional)
Symbolic Speech- the communication of ideas through symbols and actions
Freedom of Association- the right to join with others, share ideas, and work toward a common purpose
Substantial Disruption Standard- If speech would materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school it can be suppressed.
Clear and Present Danger- When words are used in a circumstance that would create clear and present danger, your speech is not protected. “We’re gonna 9/11 it, Morty!”
Actual Malice- Having the intent to ruin their reputation
Search Warrant- a legal document that allows authorities to search private property
Need probable cause and what will be searched and seized
Probable Cause- The facts available to the officer warrants a “man of reasonable caution” to conclude that certain items may be contraband or stolen property or useful as evidence of a crime
Reasonable Suspicion- A reasonable person under the circumstances, would, based upon specific and articulable facts, suspect that a crime has been committed
Used in schools
Exclusionary Rule- If a search is conducted illegally, any evidence obtained will not be allowed into court
Grand Jury- Group of people who determine if there is enough evidence to charge an individual with a federal crime.
Miranda Rights- a spontaneous statement made while in custody prior to rights being read, may be used in court
Double Jeopardy- A person cannot be tried twice for the same crime in the same court
Due Process- requirement that the government act fairly and reasonably in accordance with established laws
Substantive Due Process- This questions whether laws are in and of themselves just. Even laws properly passed may deny someone an inherent right
Procedural Due Process- This questions whether procedures are just, a person cannot be denied life, liberty, or property without first having followed all procedures listed in the constitution
Eminent Domain- government must pay for property taken for public use
Bench Trial- A trial without a jury (Judge Judy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnqPfbb0GlA)
Motion to Transfer- Legal document requesting that a trial be moved to another district because a fair trial could not be held in that state
Voir Dire- The questioning of prospective jurors by the judge and attorneys in court. It is used to determine if any juror is biased and or cannot deal with issues fairly. Allows the attorneys to get a feel for the jury





Rights involved / Basic details
Important Ruling / Impact of Ruling
U.S. v. Miller (1939)
2nd amendment
Placed some restrictions on possession of automatic weapons and sawed-off shotguns. The second Amendment protected only those guns that might be used by people in a militia
Schenk v. United States (1919)
Charles Scheck printed flyers telling men to refuse to serve in the military
Clear and present danger
Kelo v. City of New London (2005)
Eminent domain; Protection against government being able to buy land and sell it to a private company
The government can buy private land and sell it to another private individual. This is public use. Public benefit
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
High school students wore black armbands to protest the Vuietnam War. The school suspended them until they returned with no armbands. The students challenged the ruling as a First Amendment violation.
Students do not shed their rights at the door
Created the Substantial Disruption standard, which allows schools to limit speech if:
They can prove a substantial disruption occurred
OR they could prove it likely that a substantial disruption would occur


Texas v. Johnson (1989)
People burned the flag as a part of a political protest
Government cannot prohibit an expression of an idea because society finds it offensive 
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
4th amendment
Evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment is inadmissible in state courts. Exclusionary Rule
New Jersey v. T.L.O (1967) *
4th amendment
School officials may search students for drugs or weapons
Veronia School District v. Acton (1995) in conjunction with Board of Education of Pottawatomie County v. Earls (2002) *
4th amendment
Schools could randomly test student athletes for drug use. Schools may require students participating in extracurricular activities to be tested for drugs
Roe v. Wade (1973)
Right to privacy under due process clause 
Court upheld some requirements of a law that allowed abortion only after a woman met several requirements, including parental consent for pregnant minors.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Protection against self-incrimination extends outside the courtroom to when a suspect is arrested
If police do not read the Miranda rights, any statements made may not be used in court
Mackey v. Montrym (1979) * 
Protecting the public outweighs right to due process, in this case
Police can take away your license or take you into custody for refusing to take a sobriety test
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
Legal representation is another important element of a fair trial
State criminal defendants charged with a capital offense could not receive a fair trial unless they were represented by a lawyer
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Anyone who cannot afford legal help must be given a lawyer at public expense
All defendants accused of serious crimes have the right to an attorney
Furman v. Georgia (1972)



Capital punishment of a mentally handicapped person is cruel and unusual punishment
Reynolds v. United States (1878)
Religion free exercise- George Reynolds was convicted of polygamy
Unanimous government can limit actions if they are seen as criminal- ban all polygamy
New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)
NYT described false statements on racial discrimination in the South
Public officials have fewer legal protection against libel than do private citizens “actual malice”
Edwards v. South Carolina (1963) * 
An African American protest was stopped even though it was peaceful
If an assembly is peaceful, it cannot be stopped
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Right to keep and bear arms
Ownership of handguns in a home constitutes self-defense