Social Welfare Policy: A Historical and Theoretical Overview
English Poor Law of 1601
3 Basic Principles:
Local responsibility for the poor
Training their children
Employment placement for the unemployed
Law of Settlement 1662
Restricting movements of laborers & the poor
Addressing the issue of “race to the bottom” among local governments
Speenhamland Act of 1795
Wage compensation
Addressing the problem of poverty among low-income workers (jobs did not pay enough to live)
Often criticized as a “catastrophe”
Poor Law Reform of 1834
Basic view: poverty was caused by the indigence of individuals rather than economic & social conditions
Work requirements for poor relief
What is Social Welfare? A Landscape View
What is social welfare?
Social transfer (or a benefit-allocation mechanism) functioning outside the economic market.
Direct Expenditures
Direct transfer from federal, state, and local government.
Indirect Expenditures – Tax Expenditures
Allow taxpayers to reduce the amount of taxes they need to pay. e.g., mortgage interest deduction, EITC tax credit
One form of tax benefits: tax credit
Non-refundable tax credit
Refundable tax credit
Mandated Benefits – Regulatory Transfer
Government requires the private sector to provide welfare benefits
e.g., health insurance, rent control, other mandatory requirements
Voluntary Transfers
Social welfare benefits provided by voluntary (non-profit) agencies
Comparing Generosity of Welfare States
Is America less generous than most wealthy countries?
Depending on how you measure social welfare spending.
Is it able to tell which countries are more generous than others?
Probably not. Should consider social conditions of each country.
- Minus taxes on benefits
- The real dollar value of government “spending” on social welfare has to take account of how much it claws back via taxes.
3 Major Perspectives on Social Welfare Policy
Institutional
Identifies the key social structures that shape welfare activities.
Analytical
Different approaches to studying & understanding policy (Process, Product, & Performance)
Political
Interrelationships between society & government in social welfare (conservative vs. progressive)
| Conservative | Progressive | |
| Political Ideology | Individualism | Collectivism |
| View of Social Problems | Problems reflect individual fault (e.g., bad choices, personal dysfunctions) | Problems reflect institutional fault (e.g., barriers to access, lack of opportunities) |
| View of Markets | Unregulated markets & private property ensure prosperity & welfare | Unregulated markets create problems that endanger social wellbeing |
| Responsibility of Government | Government should be small | Government should be large |
| Social Policy Agenda | Rely on market; provide minimum safety net. | Rely on public leadership; provide broad coverage. |
Theoretical Perspectives on Government Spending for Social Welfare
Galbraith – The Dependence Effect
Dependence Effect
Our “needs” are created by production.
Too much private consumption on trivial items that people do not really need (does not improve the quality of life).
Public spending is too low—we need more public spending on welfare programs.
Progressive
Buchanan – Theory of Public Choice
Theory of Public Choice
Public spending is inherently high.
Because politicians are incentivized to respond to interest groups while the cost of expanding spending is low.
Government spends too much but not necessarily for public good.
Conservative
What Are the Proper Functions of Government?
Night Watchman
e.g., police, regulation, the legitimate use of force
Technical Monopoly
Government regulates organizations like PG&E to ensure quality.
e.g., post office, electricity (PG&E), gas lines – most efficient & effective to have just one producer.
Neighborhood Effects
e.g., malaria control, public health, fire department
Paternalistic Functions
Services provided by government for people who can’t take care of themselves – assigns paternal role.
Market does not work well.
e.g., children (foster care), elderly, mentally ill
Redistribution
Stabilization
(wage & price control, military policy)
4 Dimensions of Choice
The basis of social allocations
The types/nature of social provisions
The delivery of social provisions
Ways to finance social provisions
Eligibility – Who
Principles for Allocating Social Benefits
Universal
Everyone is eligible/qualifies. e.g., public education
Non-universal (Selective)
Means-Tested
Evidence regarding an individual’s inability to purchase goods or services. Usually dependent on economic circumstances.
e.g., Insurance, food stamps, affordable housing
Compensation
Groups who have made special contributions or unfairly suffered from the system should be compensated.
e.g., Veterans’ benefits, Affirmative Action in college admission, Reparations
Diagnostic Differentiation
Professionals (e.g., specialist, doctor) make judgments on individual cases on whether one is qualified for goods or services.
e.g., Disability services (physically/mentally impaired)
Provisions – What
Transferability: Flexibility in how you use it/consumer choice
High Transferability: More exchangeable, more consumer choices
e.g., cash, vouchers (e.g., food stamps, school vouchers), goods (e.g., food, clothing, housing)
Conservatives prefer high transferability – individualism, rely on market mechanism, small government.
Low Transferability: Less exchangeable, fewer consumer choices
e.g., services, power (e.g., community empowered to make their own decisions), opportunity (e.g., college admission)
Progressives prefer low transferability – collectivism, market creates problems, large government.
Social Justice in Public Assistance – Equality
Numerical equality: the same treatment of everyone – everyone gets an equal amount no matter what.
Proportional equality/equity: the same treatment of similar persons – based on the same measure of deservingness or need.
Service/Benefit Delivery – How
How people receive their voucher/service/etc.
e.g., coordination/duplication, central/decentralized, professional/non-professional, public/private
Financing – $$
Finance choices
e.g., general tax revenues vs. tax expenditures, fee for services, regulatory requirement of private finance, etc.
Path from Welfare to Workfare
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
Welfare program created by the federal government in 1935.
No time limits, no work requirements.
Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF)
Replaced AFDC in 1996.
Changes: 5-year lifetime limit (with states allowed to waive 20% for hardship cases / 20% exemption) & requires recipients to go to work while receiving the grant.
Social Security Solutions
Revisit the social security discussion question.
Big problem: social security is running out – considerations on racial, gender, & family disparities when thinking of alternative plans.
