Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research Methods Comparison

Elements of Investigation: Quantitative vs. Qualitative

1. Environment (MARCO)

  • Quantitative: Can be developed in a natural environment or a closed laboratory.
  • Qualitative: In contact with the object being studied, in a natural setting.

2. Design Structure

  • Quantitative: Requires a fixed design established a priori (in advance).
  • Qualitative: Has an emergent design; it is not fixed in advance.

3. Goals and Flexibility

  • Quantitative: Techniques are pre-set, aiming for technical flexibility.
  • Qualitative: The reality of everyday life leads to changes in techniques; it is more flexible.

4. Theoretical Framework

  • Quantitative: Always starts from a theoretical framework and previous assumptions, guiding the search for data.
  • Qualitative: Theory acts as a compass, allowing for changes; they made the same experimental contrast.

5. Sampling Strategy

  • Quantitative: Uses probability samples representative of the universe; subjects are selected randomly.
  • Qualitative: Seeks richness of content, preferring opinion-based or non-probabilistic sampling.

6. Interpretation of Results

  • Quantitative: Interpretation aims to generalize and extrapolate.
  • Qualitative: Interpretation is always specific to the universal context.

7. Implementation and Replicability

  • Quantitative: Seeks replication; only what is replicable, repeated (data, measurable, observable) is accepted.
  • Qualitative: Seeks specific cases, contexts, and environments.

8. Study Focus (Facts/Case)

  • Quantitative: Seeks social facts that are more generalized.
  • Qualitative: Focuses on the environment, meaning, construction, aiming to complexify the study as much as possible.

9. Nature of Results

  • Quantitative: Results are sought objectively.
  • Qualitative: Results are negotiated.

10. Basics of Analysis

  • Quantitative: Captures and analyzes basic social facts, especially expressed in numbers and tables.
  • Qualitative: Focuses on capturing a theory that is proven through meaning.

At that time, the following errors occur:

  • The selection of indicators.
  • When we are collecting data.
  • Coverage errors.
  • Error of the sample selected in accordance with mathematical procedures: This is the only error we can control.
  • Non-response error: Occurs because an individual in the sample refuses to respond.
  • At the time of collection, observation, or interview.
  • In the questionnaire developed (interview, etc.).
  • How it is administered (mail, etc.).
  • In the data transaction.
  • The development of the analysis of certain procedures.

Summary of Error Types

Error (Corbett):

  • Error During Operationalization: Occurs in various stages of research.
  • Sampling Error: It is the only one that is controlled.
  • Non-response Errors.
  • Systematic Errors in Phase: Produced by the researcher or by the subject we interviewed.
  • Error by Instrument: Related to the instrument we use.
Validity Measures

Content Validity: Indicators covering the specific content and meaning of it.

Criterion Validity: Correspondence with a concept and an external criterion used (e.g., comparing results with other external indicators used in other studies).

  • Predictive: Relates the data with another indicator at the same moment in time.
  • Simultaneous: Related to another record at the same moment in time.

Construct Validity: How the new indicator relates to the level of construction.