Operating System Concepts: Threads, Memory Management, and Generations
Initial Comparison: User-Level vs. Kernel-Level Threads
| Feature | User-Level Thread (ULT) | Kernel-Level Thread (KLT) |
|---|---|---|
| Managed by | Thread library at user level | Managed directly by OS kernel |
| Creation / Switching | Fast, no kernel involvement | Slower, requires kernel intervention |
| Scheduling | Done by thread library in user space | Done by OS scheduler |
| Blocking | If one thread blocks, all threads may block | One thread blocking does not affect others |
| Portability | Portable across OS (library dependent) | OS dependent, less portable |
| Example | POSIX threads in user space | Windows threads, Linux kernel threads |
1. Five Generations of Operating Systems and Examples
Operating Systems (OS) have evolved over decades, classified into five generations:
First Generation (1940–1955)
- Characteristics: No OS; machines operated on a single program at a time. Programs were executed using vacuum tubes.
- Input/Output: Punched cards, paper tape.
- Example: IBM 701, ENIAC.
Second Generation (1955–1965)
- Characteristics: Transistor-based computers; introduction of Batch Processing Systems. Jobs were submitted in batches without user interaction.
- Advantage: Efficient use of CPU compared to the first generation.
- Example: IBM 1401.
Third Generation (1965–1980)
- Characteristics: Integrated Circuits (IC) used; multiprogramming, time-sharing, and high-level language support were introduced.
- Example: IBM OS/360, UNIVAC.
- Advantage: Multiple jobs run simultaneously; better resource utilization.
Fourth Generation (1980–1990)
- Characteristics: Personal computers (PCs) became popular; GUI (Graphical User Interface) introduced.
- Example: Windows 3.1, Mac OS.
- Advantage: User-friendly, supports multitasking.
Fifth Generation (1990–Present)
- Characteristics: Modern OS; distributed systems, real-time OS, mobile OS, AI integration.
- Example: Linux, Android, iOS.
- Advantage: Supports networking, mobile computing, cloud computing.
Diagram:
1st → 2nd → 3rd → 4th → 5th
(No OS) → Batch → Multiprogramming → GUI/PC → Distributed/AI
Extra Notes for Marks: Highlight evolution, examples, advantages, and types.
2. Comparing Batch, Time-Sharing, and Real-Time OS
| Feature | Batch OS | Time-Sharing OS | Real-Time OS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Executes jobs in batches without user interaction | Multiple users share CPU; interactive | Responds instantly to external events |
| User Interaction | No interaction | Interactive | Immediate response required |
| Response Time | High | Moderate | Very low (deterministic) |
| CPU Utilization | Efficient | Moderate | High |
| Job Scheduling | FIFO | Round-Robin or Priority | Priority/Deadline-based |
| Example | IBM OS/360 | UNIX | Embedded systems, RTLinux |
Explanation:
- Batch OS: Suitable for large jobs like payroll.
- Time-Sharing OS: Multiple users use CPU simultaneously.
- Real-Time OS: Critical for applications like pacemakers, railway signaling.
Diagram for Understanding:
Batch OS: Job1 → Job2 → Job3
Time-Sharing: User1 ↔ CPU ↔ User2 ↔ CPU
Real-Time: Event occurs → Immediate response
3. Process Control Block (PCB): Definition and Components
Definition:
A Process Control Block (PCB) is a data structure maintained by the OS to store all information about a process. It acts as the identity card of a process.
Key Components (with explanation):
- Process ID (PID): Unique identifier for each process.
- Process State: Current state – New, Ready, Running, Waiting, Terminated.
- Program Counter (PC): Address of the next instruction to execute.
- CPU Registers: Includes accumulator, index, and general-purpose registers.
- CPU Scheduling Info: Priority, pointers to scheduling queues.
- Memory Management Info: Base/limit registers, page tables, segment tables.
- I/O Status Info: List of I/O devices allocated to the process.
- Accounting Info: CPU usage, execution time, resource utilization.
Diagram:
PCB Structure
------------------------
| PID |
| Process State |
| Program Counter |
| CPU Registers |
| Scheduling Info |
| Memory Info |
| I/O Info |
| Accounting Info |
------------------------
Extra Notes:
PCB allows the OS to switch context and resume process execution efficiently.
4. Understanding the Thread Life Cycle States
Thread States:
- New: Thread object is created but
start()has not been called. - Runnable (Ready): Thread is ready and waiting for the CPU.
- Running: Thread is executing instructions on the CPU.
- Blocked/Waiting: Thread waits for resources or events (e.g., I/O).
- Terminated: Thread finishes execution or is killed.
Diagram:
New
|
v
Runnable <--> Running
| |
v v
Waiting <----> Blocked
|
v
Terminated
Example:
- Runnable: A thread waiting in the CPU queue.
- Blocked: Waiting for a file read operation.
5. Detailed Comparison of User and Kernel Threads
| Feature | User-Level Threads (ULT) | Kernel-Level Threads (KLT) |
|---|---|---|
| Managed by | User library | OS Kernel |
| Switching | Fast (no kernel involvement) | Slower (requires system call) |
| Portability | High | OS dependent |
| Concurrency | Only one thread per process runs on CPU | True concurrent execution on multiple CPUs |
| Example | Java threads, POSIX pthreads | Windows threads, Linux threads |
| Context Switch Cost | Low | High |
| Scheduling | Handled by user library | Handled by kernel |
Example:
- ULT: Multiple Java threads in a single process.
- KLT: Windows threads executing on multiple cores.
6. Short Note on Swapping and Segmentation
Swapping:
- Moving processes between main memory and secondary storage.
- Purpose: To free memory for other processes and improve CPU utilization.
- Example: Process A swapped out → Process B swapped in.
Segmentation:
- Dividing memory into logical segments: Code, Data, Stack.
- Each segment has a base & limit.
- Purpose: Modular, supports protection, easier growth.
- Example: Code segment grows → Stack segment remains unaffected.
Diagram:
Memory
----------------
| Code Segment |
| Data Segment |
| Stack Segment|
----------------
7. Short Note on Virtual Memory
Definition:
- Virtual memory allows the execution of processes larger than RAM using secondary memory (disk).
Advantages:
- Enables multiprogramming.
- Increases CPU utilization.
- Provides process isolation.
Diagram:
Process Logical Address
--------------------
| Code Segment |
| Data Segment |
| Stack Segment |
--------------------
|
v
Virtual Memory
-----------------
| RAM |
| Disk (Pagefile)|
-----------------
Example: Paging allows logical pages to be mapped to physical frames in RAM.
8. Logical to Physical Address Translation in Paging
Process:
- Logical Address = Page Number + Offset
- Use the Page Table to find the Frame Number
- Physical Address = Frame Number × Frame Size + Offset
Example:
- Page size = 1 KB, Logical Address = 2050
- Page Number = 2050 ÷ 1024 = 2
- Offset = 2050 % 1024 = 2
- If Frame 2 is mapped to physical frame 5 → Physical Address = 5×1024 + 2 = 5122
Diagram:
Logical Address
[Page No | Offset]
|
v
Page Table
|
v
Physical Frame + Offset = Physical Address
9. What is Thrashing? Causes and Effects
- Definition:
Thrashing occurs when the CPU spends more time swapping pages than executing instructions.
Reasons:
- Insufficient physical memory.
- High degree of multiprogramming.
- Poor page replacement algorithm.
Example:
- If RAM can hold 20 pages, and 10 processes each need 10 pages, this leads to constant swapping and Thrashing.
Effect:
- System slows down, resulting in low CPU utilization.
Diagram (Conceptual):
[Process1] Page Fault → Swap
[Process2] Page Fault → Swap
CPU idle, memory busy swapping
10. Distinguishing Protection and Security in OS
| Feature | Protection | Security |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Control access to resources | Defend against unauthorized access |
| Goal | Prevent misuse by legitimate users | Prevent attacks by outsiders |
| Mechanism | Access control, permissions | Firewalls, antivirus, encryption |
| Example | File read/write permissions | Firewall blocking malware |
Explanation:
- Protection: Internal to the OS, e.g., only the owner can modify a file.
- Security: Deals with outside threats, e.g., preventing hackers from stealing data.
