Labor Market Dynamics: Wages, Employment, and Training Insights
Understanding Key Labor Market Dynamics
Minimum Wage Impact and Policy
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 was the first major piece of protective labor legislation in the United States. It established the initial minimum wage at $0.25. Subsequent changes saw the minimum wage rise to $5.85 in 2007 and $7.25 in 2009.
Nominal Versus Real Wages
General price inflation gradually lowers the real minimum wage during the years between congressional action. What appears to be a fixed minimum wage turns out to have constantly changing incentives for employment. The federal minimum wage in the United States is uniformly applied to a large country characterized by regional differences in prices. This leads to the prediction that employment effects of a uniformly applied minimum wage law generally will be most adverse in regions with the lowest costs of living.
Minimum Wage in Competitive vs. Monopsony Markets
In a competitive market, the imposition of a minimum wage above the equilibrium wage necessarily reduces employment, as learned in the chapter on perfectly competitive labor markets. In a monopsony market, however, a minimum wage above the equilibrium wage could increase employment at the same time as it boosts wages. The effects of a higher minimum wage are ambiguous: some firms might experience increases in employment, but others might be forced to close because higher total labor costs render their operations non-profitable. If monopsonistic conditions exist, then theory leads us to expect that employment responses to wage changes generated by market forces might be different from employment responses to legislated wage increases.
Theoretical Results: 100% Coverage in a Growing Economy
The existence of uncovered sectors significantly affects how the overall employment of low-wage workers will respond to increases in the minimum wage. Employers must pay wages equal to at least the minimum wage; wages in the uncovered sector are free to vary with market conditions.
Part-Time Employment Trends and Policy Implications
Growth of Part-Time Employment
Part-time employment has grown as a share of total employment in most European countries and in the United States in recent years. Explanations for this growth have focused mainly on the workers’ preferences based on the supply side of the labor market and on the changing industrial composition of employment.
- The growing shares of married women with children in the labor force, of older workers phasing into retirement, and of students who need to work to finance their educations are all thought to have increased the number of workers willing to work part-time.
- On the demand side, growth in the share of service-sector employment has increased the number of jobs in which part-time workers can be easily employed.
Additionally, if hourly labor costs or the quasi-fixed costs of part-time workers fall relative to those of full-time workers, part-time employment should expand relative to full-time employment.
Impact of Mandated Health Insurance on Part-Time Workers
A recurrent policy proposal aimed at expanding health insurance coverage for American citizens is to require employers to provide medical insurance to all employees. Health insurance costs are quasi-fixed, and mandating employer-provided health insurance for all employees is predicted to disproportionately reduce the demand for part-time workers, on two accounts:
- Cost Increases for Firms: Relatively few part-time workers are currently provided with health insurance by their employers. Therefore, firms that heavily use part-time workers would face the greatest cost increases, other things equal.
- Increased Quasi-Fixed Costs: Mandated health insurance would raise the quasi-fixed costs of hiring workers relative to employing fewer workers for longer hours, thus increasing the costs of hiring part-time workers relative to full-time employees.
Shifting Labor Force Participation and Work Hours
Demographic Shifts in Labor Force Participation
One of the most dramatic changes has been the increased labor force participation of women, especially married women. By 1980, this percentage had doubled, and recently, the labor force participation rate of married women has reached over 60 percent.
A second set of changes in labor force participation is the decrease in the participation rates of men, especially among the young and the old. For those 65 and older, participation fell from about 42 percent in 1950 to about half that currently. Clearly, men are starting their work lives later and ending them earlier than they were in 1950.
Factors Influencing Hours Worked
Hours worked are influenced by employee preferences on the supply side of the market, especially in the long run. While the labor supply preferences of employees must be satisfied in the long run, most of the short-run changes in hours of work seem to emanate from the demand side of the market. Workweeks typically vary over the course of a business cycle.
Workforce Training: General vs. Specific Skills
General Training
General training teaches workers skills that can be used to enhance their productivity with many employers. Examples include learning how to speak English, use a word-processing program, drive a truck, or create websites.
Specific Training
Specific training teaches workers skills that increase their productivity only with the employer providing the training. Examples include teaching workers how to use a machine unique to their workplace or orienting them to particular procedures and people they will need to deal with in various circumstances they will encounter at work.
Employers have stronger incentives to invest in specific training because such training does not raise the worker’s productivity with other firms, and it therefore does not make the worker more attractive to competing employers.
Key Concepts & Review Points
- General training…the employee.
- Specific training…both the.
- After general training…less than.
- During a recession… workers with specific.
- A firm could…the training program.
- The use of…most upper-level.
- All else…stay at the firm for a long.
- Statistical discrimination is…judging.
- In Japan…higher;lower.
- Training costs…arise.
- Since 1950…fallen;risen.
- Temporary workers…have lower.
- If employers…employment levels will probably decrease.
- An increase in the… decrease both.
- In Japan, wages…Japanese workers have more training.
- During the twentieth…decreased;increased.
- Employment often…independently.
- The minimum wage…most workers.
- If the labor…increase wages.
- A quasi…is proportional to the number of workers hired.
- Which…overtime pay.
- Use of temporary…requires employers.
- Legislation requiring…decrease;increase.
- If a firm offers…workers will most likely be paid a wage that is less than their marginal product.
- Workers with…less;their wage.
- Employment-at-will…both employees.
BONUS Review Points
- Marginal resource…is the same.
- Under…the wage rate will be W2 and Q2.
- Now…the wage rate will be W3.
- Now assume…W1