Descartes Contextualization
-Clarity: It appears as dark anything not shown identical with itself. A good logical deduction is that which leads to establish an identity, a tautology between two things. -Distinction: a thing is identical with itself when it can be separated from the others. The distinction eliminates the confusion of some things with others. Only clear and distinct it can give us certainty. In short, the variety of philosophical opinions was a depressing spectacle. Hence it was necessary to find a universal knowledge. According to Descartes had not come to that knowledge by the absence of a valid and proper, which he said should be the mathematical method, using intuition and deduction.Impact. The Cartesian belief that autonomous reason is the only guide for man may be determined primarily rationalist character of all modern philosophy. But the concrete way in which Descartes conceives of reason will lead the call modern rationalism (Malebranche, Spinoza, Leibniz and Descartes), will be criticized by Kant and Hume. The Cartesian approach to knowledge and the solution gives, in which the only strong point of all knowledge is the self and its ideas of reason, give rise to the ideal. But the idealism (rationalism) differs from subsequent idealism “epistemological: because the cogito does not create the world, but only knows it,” subjective, because even if the cogito is the basis of all knowledge belongs and is internal to a subject, is not itself independently. Descartes gives rise to process formalizaciion of science and tries a new method, a new science that will institute a modern method of thinking, as opposed to scholastic-Aristotelian. Descartes’s work was so important in mathematics and philosophy. With the creation of the coordinate system laid the basis of analytic geometry. The fundamental methodological concern of Descartes, as embodied in the criteria of clarity and distinction, are the factors that influence the development of rationalist philosophers thought later: Pascal’s Cartesian orientation behind the new research ideal proclaimed by Descartes. -Spinoza part of the Cartesian definition of substance and takes it to the end. -Malabranche occasionalism defended the theory whereby the relationship of body and soul takes place only through divine intervention. Finally, note that British empiricism is a historical constant rationalism. Empiricism denies the existence of innate knowledge, and therefore claims that all our knowledge comes from experience.