Chilean Health Reform: Law, Equity, and Access

Law Reform and Health Authority

Total population: 16,454,143 inhabitants.

FONASA: 12.817 million inhabitants (77.9%).

  • Inequities in health in Chile: 42% of the population has an average mortality risk. Infant mortality during ’98 in Puerto Saavedra was 42.2 per 1,000 live births and 2.62 per 1,000 in Vitacura.
      • Annual expenditure per capita (1999): public U$ 210, private U$ 500.
        • 1999: 66.5% of medical care was provided by the public health service, serving 1/3 of the population.
  • Perception of users:
      • Poor quality care.
        • Discrimination: socio-economic, indigenous, etc.
        • Prolonged waiting times.
  • Perceived by staff:
  • Lack of resources (human, material, and financial).
  • Excessive centralization of decisions.
  • Lack of coordination and poor management and administration.
  • Reform:
  • Health goals:
      • Achievements in improving health objectives.
      • Addressing the challenges of aging.
      • Reducing inequalities.
      • Satisfying the needs and expectations of the population.
  • Model:
      • Emphasis on promotion and prevention.
      • Integration of the service network.
      • Strengthening primary health care.

Situation 2005

  • Weak integration of the social network, both public and private.
  • Inadequate protection due to low coverage of private health insurance, asymmetry, and high transmission costs.
  • Mixed health functions and delivery of services across the structure.
  • Excessive rules and lack of them in nursing care, environment, and occupational health.
  • Insufficient targeting of private health.
  • Failure of the legal structure that prevents integration.

Structural aspects necessary for reform:

  • Strengthening national and regional health authority.
  • Integration of the service network.
  • Separation of health authority functions from health service benefits.
  • Hospitals: flexibility to manage their resources and their management to realize.
  • Incentives based on health goals, program management, and retirement incentives.

Law No 19,937 amending D. L n° 2763 “to establish a new conception of the health authority, different management arrangements, and strengthen citizen participation.”

Purpose of the reform:

  • Strengthen the governing and regulatory role of the Health Authority in the public and private sectors.
  • Define clear rules, obligations, and regulations for all.
  • Supervise, monitor, and assess compliance with health targets at the local and regional levels.
  • Develop new skills to ensure protection and health promotion.
  • Ensure access to services.

Draft of new reform:

  • Finance Law: ensuring resources for reform, including a 1% increase in VAT (approved).
  • Health Authority Act: separates the functions of health service provision and regulation of the sector, strengthens the health authority, and creates a system of accreditation of public and private providers (approved).
  • AUGE Act: creates an explicit guarantee scheme for access, opportunity, quality, and financial protection for a set of priority diseases (approved).
  • ISAPRES Act: ensures system stability, improves transparency, and enhances the role of the Superintendency (approved).
  • Law and duties of patients: protects patients and regulates issues such as informed consent (in parliamentary debate).

The thrust of the reform

  • Health goals.
  • Care model.
  • Health Authority.
  • Modernization of assistance networks.
  • Solidarity financing.
  • Social participation.
  • GES.

Health Objectives 2000 – 2010

  • Maintain and improve the health gains achieved.
  • Facing new challenges of population aging.
  • Reducing inequalities in health situations and access to health care.
  • Provide services according to the needs and expectations of the population.

Functions of the Health Authority:

  • Population health diagnosis.
  • Regulation and control of the health sector by the health authority.
  • Health Planning and Management.
  • Health Authority responsible for the national vaccine program, supplementary feeding program of the mother, child, and elderly.
  • Epidemiology.
  • Environmental monitoring.
  • Health Promotion.
  • Civic Engagement.
  • Public health research.

Care network modernization

  • Implementation of direct health actions to the user by the service network of hospitals, clinics, doctors, private laboratories, and dialysis centers.

Security Act explicitly in health: Universal Access Explicit Guarantees (AUGE)

Law No. 19,966 establishes a health guarantee scheme:

  • Enacted 25.Aug.2004.
  • FONASA and ISAPRE are responsible for fulfilling the guarantees.
  • The healthcare network is responsible for realizing the GES system.

Repeated assurances to the first point.

GES Decree 2006/56 guaranteed health problems

Base for reform:

  • It must ensure access to health without arbitrary exclusion or discrimination of any kind.
  • It must ensure better standards of health, health outcomes, and quality of life for the population.
  • Reform should introduce equity and solidarity to the funding issue, where all contribute according to their abilities and benefit from their needs.
  • It should complement the public and private provision systems, integrated care networks, and decisive action.
  • You must change the model of care focused on promoting health and preventing chronic diseases and others linked to development and lifestyles.
  • The reform must consider the rights, duties, and guarantees of health care for people (required).
  • You must humanize health care by generating quality standards, access, and opportunity for benefits.
  • It should ensure maximum protection of public health for private and public sectors.
  • Eliminate or reduce the national and local health gaps related to health care.

North of reform: “to improve health care for all Chileans… avoiding the inequities of today.”

Health reform: a revolutionary change:

  • New concept of health rights: the rise and guarantees required of the Public Health Plan.
  • The focus of the action, not the fulfillment of institutional goals.
  • National and regional health authorities to strengthen public health: promotion and prevention, control, intelligence generation, health, and intersectoral action.
  • Strengthening assistance networks: more resources, investment, and technology.

AUGE: GES

To equal access for all, regardless of sex, age, place of residence, or health system.

Opportunity sets a deadline for guaranteed actions.

Quality of care and ISAPRE Fons providers offer similar standards of quality.

Financial protection for free or co-payment cap, according to income.

Strengthening the regional health authority

  • Separation of the functions of network management and monitoring of public health services.

Direct Health Service Manager – care networks

Regional Secretary of the Ministry of Health Regional Health Authority